2 Comments

Thanks, nice little catalogue of similar approach all trying to undcover what really needs to be done to progress against a goal. I've noticed over the years that the same idea crops up again and again in different language and descriptions, like the goal itself: goal, mission, mission statement, purpose, North Star, True North, BHAG, MTP.

In execution you want lots and lots of small pieces: but in deciding what to those pieces add up to you must run to the opposite extreme, get big (meaningful and devoid of action) and work back to action and lots of little pieces

Expand full comment

Exactly. I expect with growth in those building software, oriented around outcomes the next frontier is improving how the WHY is communicated. There have been approaches dating back decades at least but I suspect a natural resurgence in activity in testing approaches to this. I am interested in the degree a strategy might be expressed through the relationships between outcomes across different time windows. A topic I am exploring in this publication. Thanks for your comment and the examples - I am familiar with some but not all so some extra reading for me!

Expand full comment